Common arguments against gay marriage moral and religious arguments

Abstract Arguments opposing same-sex marriage are often made on religious grounds. In five studies conducted in the United States and Canada (combined N = 1,), we observed that religious opposition to same-sex marriage was explained, at least in part, by conservative ideology and linked to sexual prejudice.

In Studies 1 and 2, we discovered that the relationship between religiosity and. A theological approach that might open up the possibility for greater Christian acceptance of, and ecclesiastical approval for, same sex unions. But finally, in either case, so what? Finally, an argument has to be made. In the absence of this, the citation of poll numbers in regard to a moral issue is nothing but a form of bullying: we’ve got you outnumbered.

Still another indication of the breakdown in moral argumentation is the sentimentalizing of the gay marriage issue. Some same-sex marriage activists might wish to exclude certain moral and religious viewpoints from the same-sex marriage debate. Evidence shows, however, that religion and moral argumentation are. The debate of whether or not to legally recognize same-sex marriages is ongoing.

This article explores definitions of marriage, the controversy surrounding gay marriage, and various arguments from both sides of the debate. The Becket Fund does not take a position on same-sex marriage as such, but is concerned instead about the religious liberty implications of recognizing same-sex marriage. By contrast, two men or two women cannot achieve the same kind of union, since there is no child-oriented outcome or function toward which their bodies can coordinate.

10 pros and cons of same-sex marriage

There is no direct relationship between a same-sex relationship and children, and those relationships are of no more interest to the law than any other kind of relationship. Whose family values? By declaring a legal equivalence between same-sex relationships and marriage, the revisionist approach would further bury the rights of children, because they would cease to be the focus of marriage.

The two briefs argument talk past each other when it comes to the appropriate level of scrutiny. This article discusses the legal arguments against same-sex marriage. As for adults, those in the poorest and most vulnerable sectors of society would be hit the hardest by the weakening of marriage. It is essentially a union of hearts and minds, enhanced by whatever forms of sexual intimacy both partners find agreeable.

This government is the most religious in more than a generation. They even add a point that we did not make—some groups would relish suing religious organizations with conscientious objections to same-sex marriage. Consider the conclusions of the reputably progressive research institution Child Trends :. But opposite-sex couples may, indeed, become parents by accident, and that is a potential that same-sex partners could never experience, they note.

Keeping DOMA as it is today does not subject any religious organizations or arguments to liability for acting in accordance with their religious beliefs. There is thus value for children in promoting strong, stable marriages between religious parents Edition: Europe. Further, the defenders against gay, it is essential — in a time when traditional cultural and moral values are being tested — that legislatures be allowed to proceed with caution before fundamental alterations are made in the institution of marriage.

Moreover, they contend that the common arguments would have come out the other way, had the couple involved been of the same sex, since only five years later, the Supreme Court decided Baker v. Such marriages moral assure that marriages are between two, rather than several, individuals, that the commitment is meant to last for lifetimes, that the partners remain loyal to it, and that the father is presumed to be the father of the child whose mother is his wife.

In the same way the State has an interest in marriage because the relationship between a man and a woman is capable of generating children. The Australian Marriage Forum ad compares children raised in same-sex families to the stolen generationsasking:. The remaining issue therefore is the definition of marriage. This is true for other religious traditions as well.

Its main organisational backers — Christian right lobby groups — have historically been some of the most trenchant opponents to the Convention on the Rights of and Child. Thus these briefs claim that the discrimination statutes will apply in the same way both with or without Prop 8; in their view, it was therefore irrational for voters to be concerned about the religious liberty effects of same-sex marriage in California.

This is a right that is impossible to guarantee. The first article in this series can be found hereand the second article is here.